Connecting the Dots

Kant we all get along without going to Hegel, or without a Hume or* Mill?**
Knot too tangent ?

*not too go here ?
[General Obstruction Party?]

4-20-13 CBC Day 6
**(original) "or without Hume or* Mills?"
(Fair and Balanced? EA / hosts)

PC [^]

Pathological[!] Corner*

Kant we all get along without going to Hegel?
Not without Hume or Mill.
Forgot the punch line.**

* (b.s. )
** the third clause will come to me(was it the bottom line?)

[!] =  "..." or (sic){L} (i.e.) ePH'n pun
Related googles: a, b, c

Inspiration: perspectivism on progress
[Un-PC or Ahegelian? Or Perspective Catch.]

11-23-13 The Foundation [!]***

*** routing branches (knot too frack) Hegelian Punditry
{spoiler alert} [^]  R "air quotes" needed?

All Blank are not created equally.

Under 4eh[!]

OK, one of the A's was "anecdotal".  Not only that it was an old story and not much of one.
(Open carry robbed of gun at gun point.)
One of the four blank or Hume or everything. 
"Kant we get along..." etc.
Let alone Bane or...Mill.
Let alone "Math is next to..." rhetoric of the I ron knee age.

Just because you think(...) doesn't mean someone is not.
Tan gent: Hegelian Fallacy. 

https://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html

http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hegelian+dialectic*

http://www.therightplanet.com/2014/01/hegelian-dialectics-for-dummies/

*Not to mention, not all links are created equal.

[  http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm ]

An  Inconvenient Truth ?

Or unweaving of a quilt?

[2A] Academics is like congress, you have to remember there is always perspectivism. 

Anti-semantics or...**

Parsing Semitics.
        -  /  -


Anti-Semantics.*


A. Not In My Name: Some Facebook funny-business brought the first link to my attention.
B. Facebook Empathy the 2nd insert.
C. True Torah expressions.
D. Not In My Name but whose?
-/-

* See D irony?
---


Kant we all get along without going to Hegel, or without Hume or Mill?
Thesis/Anti-Thesis/Sin-Thesis?***
---


** Work in Progress!  But before I get too fractal or tangent shall, the terminology is pertinent, what is the difference between insurgents and rhetorical terrorists?  They certainly Rn't strategic terrorists[?]  ALSO: Caution with the reading of semantics and semitics[!].  Rhetorically, why is anti-semitic a word while semitics a questionable word?  Could it be in the parsing of semitics?  Pardon the Escher-risks.
...


*** Not to Escher the Charlotte.[link is late insert not fully read]

Kant we get along...

...without going thru Hegel?
Or Knot without Hume or Mill?
Or put Decartes Be4 De-Horsemen.

Knot 2B a needle in a Hayes tack. 

2-3-14  update label Neo-con, Wolfowitz

FOOTNOTES PAGE NOVEMBER 2013

11-1-13 "Obama" "Right" NFRY Under X-tent of AMC.
11-3-13 "Kant we all..." in draft

11-5-13: A. this page, B. 11-1, D. (b.s.) of Kant Hegel Mill(sic), C. Connecting the Dots (let alone Hume or...)
11-6-13: "Un-curving" (b.s.) // 4-15-12 V for Victim, 3-9-11 The Curve or Nuance Thing, 6-23-11 Over Helming., 6-29-09  Voodoo Economics Redux? , 10-19-10  Debt and Tax Cuts, , 7-29-10  Economic Reform., 10-14-13 Government Hostage, 7-1-13 (FP2), 3-3-11 The one thing?,(back to post) 6-29-11 Caging Godzillas 

11-9-13 further unembedding 

11-21-13 Progress is problematic. So is reading. This is not too spoiler alert or pun, but I was glad to read the former and there is more to the ladder.

11-24-13 Fortunate (b.s.) Jumping the Shark?,  To be determined*, Meta PI, To Filter, E.(sc), Tacky, tact, tack..., Rubric's Peek, WikiLeaks’ Paul Ryan exposure, I. Over Helming. J. Odyssey Dawn , K. Historic Health Care Bill Passed,{under glass}, Who the heck..., M. Flip-Flopper-Crafting , N. CONnecting the . . .   anomalic searching? ePH'n ponder? Conservative Foray (4A) (speaking of search) (R C under MNoh?) (FP2)

Between Iraq and a Hard Work!

Democracy is a Hard Place!  Shock and Awe are not tools, they are weapons.  Hume or Mill will be part of the hard work.  Not to mention Kant we all get along without going to Hegel.
Pardon my aphorismal heading or mangling [!]  

The Tetrahedron of Will

This page is under repair.(6-8-26)

1/18/07:   Hit and Run Gang  seems to be my earliest use of the Tetrahedron of Will

Now I must (thanks to Meta or other AI) reference others who used it. See previous post. 

Arthur Young. Abraham Maslow.

*Maslow, I knew before the geometric projection.  Arthur Young,after the development of my tetrahedron. 

Already credited Einstein and Plato.   

Must add: Kant, Hegel, Hume, Mill. 

R. Buckminster Fuller.  (In this case a belated credit but right after Plato.   

The Republic I represented in a book report in Junior High. And in High School I attended an assembly with R. Buckminster Fuller, the guest.

*Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: a triangle.

 

5/16/26

Another name and categorical is Emerson and the Existentialists and Romantics.